1. Applying
  2. Supplementary Application Rubrics

Supplementary Application Rubrics

 

Video Recorded Response

Score  Criteria 

Developing (1)

 

  • Provides a vague or superficial example or does not address the specific question being asked.
  • Shows little appreciation of others’ perspectives
  • Little awareness of their own contributions or impact on the team.
  • Lacks meaningful reflection or learning.

 
Basic (2)

 

  • Describes an example with limited detail or does not directly answer the question.
  • Shows some ability to appreciate others’ perspectives
  • Shows some awareness of their own contributions and impact to the team
  • Minimal reflection and/or connection to personal growth.
Competent (3)

 

  • Provides a clear and relevant example.
  • Demonstrates reasonable adaptability and respect for others’ contributions.
  • Takes some responsibility for their actions and understands their impact on the team.
  • Reflection includes a few insights into what they learned and/or connection to personal growth.
  • Strong (4)

 

  • Shares a thoughtful, specific example.
  • Shows strong initiative, adaptability, and appreciation for the perspectives of others.
  • Takes ownership of their actions and has a strong understanding of their impact on the team.
  • Demonstrates some reflection on what they learned and how it shaped their perspective or behavior going forward.
Exceptional (5) 

 

  • Presents a vivid, authentic, and reflective example.
  • Demonstrates maturity, self-direction, and creativity or composure under pressure.
  • Handles setbacks or complexity with clarity and purpose.
  • Reflects meaningfully on what they learned and how it shaped their perspective or behavior going forward.

 

 

Written Response 

Score  Criteria
Developing (1)

 

  • The applicant provides a vague or superficial account of a challenge or does not address the specific question being asked.
  • Shows little to no evidence of initiative adaptability, and/or persistence
  • Little attempt at problem-solving
  • Lacks meaningful reflection or learning.

 
Basic (2)

 

  • The applicant identifies a challenge with some detail but gives a limited or surface-level description of their actions.
  • Demonstrates minimal initiative, adaptability and/or persistence
  • There is an attempt at problem-solving
  • Minimal reflection and/or connection to personal growth.

 
  • Competent (3)

 

  • The applicant describes a clear and relevant challenge.
  • Demonstrates some initiative, adaptability and/or persistence
  • Problem-solving that shows some effort and thought, as appropriate.
  • Reflection includes a few insights into what they learned and/or connection to personal growth

 
Strong (4)

 

  • The applicant presents a specific, well-articulated example of a significant challenge.
  • Demonstrates clear initiative, adaptability, and/or persistence in overcoming obstacles.
  • Problem-solving is thoughtful and appropriate
  • Demonstrates some reflection on what they learned and how it shaped their perspective or behavior going forward.

 
Exceptional (5)

 

  • The applicant shares a compelling, authentic account of a significant challenge.
  • Demonstrates exceptional initiative, adaptability, persistence
  • Problem-solving is appropriate, thoughtful, and shows planning or creativity
  • Reflects meaningfully on what they learned and how it shaped their perspective or behavior going forward.